Coconutheads Posted May 16, 2009 Report Share Posted May 16, 2009 One other interesting item noticed this turn... After obliterating the Obsidian ships over the former Roman HW, I issued GEO, PMAP and ORB orders. Turns out there were 3 popgroups belonging to The Eyre (one containing over 620,000 pops, the other two with 0 pops) and 2 popgroups belonging to Obsidian Inc (both had zero pops). As the populated popgroup was controlled by The Eyre and the spaceforces over the planet were controlled by Obsidian Inc, does that mean that they are working together? Is there some unholy alliance formed by these two players? Or does one player run both positions??? Thoughts/comments would be most welcome... anyone? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krelnett_of_Kraan Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 It's also possible one was attacking the other and you interrupted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
President James Tiberius Kirk Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 When I first encountered Obsidian, Inc., MMB was the only person who responded. He later stated he was not running Obsidian, Inc. Based upon previous communications and other information received, it has been my conclusion for a long time that if Obsidian, Inc. and the Eyre are not run by the same person, they are at least working together. Kirk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Deependra Posted May 18, 2009 Report Share Posted May 18, 2009 I have always believed that Mad Martin is running both of those empires. Having three empires so close together is part of the reason for his success. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vince Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 It's also possible one was attacking the other and you interrupted. I think that Krenlett has it right. In the other Coconutheads thread, he indicates destroying 5000 troops orbiting the HW - It appears to me that Coconutheads got Lucky and interrupted a HW assault by Obsidian. I have always believed that Mad Martin is running both of those empires. Having three empires so close together is part of the reason for his success. From my viewpoint MMB hasn't been overly successful, just very prolific in starting empires. But its a good point that he appears to start multiple empires at the same time, I think it more likely that MMB runs Coconutheads - look at posts from both, they have a similar tone. We've seen no posts/comments from Obsidian, if MMB was playing this position - I have no doubt some comment would be made. To quote comedian Ron White..... MMB "has the right to remain silent, but not the ability." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Shadow Imperium Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 I had something strange happen this last turn, Obsidian showed up in the same area as the Cnut scout ships I blew up. I recall Cnut asking Obsidian for a list of sightings of my empire, but I thought that was BS. Are you two working together? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coconutheads Posted August 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 I had something strange happen this last turn, Obsidian showed up in the same area as the Cnut scout ships I blew up. I recall Cnut asking Obsidian for a list of sightings of my empire, but I thought that was BS. Are you two working together? If you address me properly I will answer your question. Until then, no answer for you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paradigm Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 I had something strange happen this last turn, Obsidian showed up in the same area as the Cnut scout ships I blew up. I recall Cnut asking Obsidian for a list of sightings of my empire, but I thought that was BS. Are you two working together? If you address me properly I will answer your question. Until then, no answer for you. As an innocent bystander, I do find some amusement in that someone calling themselves "Coconutheads" would complain about how others referred to them. Or is there something inherently derogatory about the nickname "Cnut" that I'm not catching? -P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Breoghan Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 I had something strange happen this last turn, Obsidian showed up in the same area as the Cnut scout ships I blew up. I recall Cnut asking Obsidian for a list of sightings of my empire, but I thought that was BS. Are you two working together? If you address me properly I will answer your question. Until then, no answer for you. As an innocent bystander, I do find some amusement in that someone calling themselves "Coconutheads" would complain about how others referred to them. Or is there something inherently derogatory about the nickname "Cnut" that I'm not catching? -P As another innocent bystander, I thought I'd comment on the obvious, though perhaps unintended transposition of two letters in the term "Cnut" from a somewhat crude four-letter word. I will say that I've seen nothing that suggests this was a deliberate misspelling rather than an innocent abreviation of Coconutheads though. Only the guy who first coined the term could say for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coconutheads Posted August 21, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 I had something strange happen this last turn, Obsidian showed up in the same area as the Cnut scout ships I blew up. I recall Cnut asking Obsidian for a list of sightings of my empire, but I thought that was BS. Are you two working together? If you address me properly I will answer your question. Until then, no answer for you. As an innocent bystander, I do find some amusement in that someone calling themselves "Coconutheads" would complain about how others referred to them. Or is there something inherently derogatory about the nickname "Cnut" that I'm not catching? -P Actually, a couple weeks ago I was referred to as the almighty coconutheads. At the time I thought it was a bit pretentious but agreed to be addressed that way... So I will answer his question as long as he addresses me properly. That's pretty much it. BTW, what's amusing about Coconutheads? It's a long and illustrious name glorified for centuries on our HW, a combination of two of the most pre-eminent families on our HW, The House of Coco and The Principality of Gnutheads (the G was dropped for the sake of brevity). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Shadow Imperium Posted September 4, 2009 Report Share Posted September 4, 2009 Battle with Obsidian this turn. Same area that Cnuts is surveying. ** NAVAL BATTLE REPORT ** ----- ??????? [ G (Yellow) 8 V ] [single Star] - Warp Point ????? ----- Obsidian, Inc # 1827 (No Naval Commanders) Total tonnage: 5,000,000.....Base Fire Control: 40 [202,500,000 bridge] White Shadow Imperium # 3520 (No Naval Commanders) Total tonnage: 24,764,000.....Base Fire Control: 49 [1,215,000,000 bridge] WSI 7400 White Shadow Imperium #3520 Ranger ------------------------------- ** Imperial Navy Report: Fleet Order of Battle ** ------------------------------------------ Obsidian, Inc # 1827 [Mailed Fist With Single Claw Extended To The Stars] Ominous Sky [ROE: R] *Standard Line* (Fleet Tonnage: 5,000,000) [Deploy Location 2] 1 BB Stormcrow (Battleship - 5,000,000 tons [each]) <650,000 Fuel> ------------------------------- ** Imperial Navy Report: Fleet Order of Battle ** ------------------------------------------ White Shadow Imperium # 3520 [There Be Dragons Here] WSI 7400 [ROE: X] *Column Attack* (Fleet Tonnage: 24,764,000) [Deploy Location 11] 1 WDN Ice Berg s (War Dreadnaught - 24,764,000 tons [each]) <3,514,160 Fuel> ** Battle Damage Assessment Report ** -------------------------------------------------- DepLoc 2 ------------------------------------------------------------ **DESTROYED** [1st] BB Stormcrow (Battleship - 5,000,000 tons) [integrity: 0 / 1,696,960,000] (Green, Timid) 250 Fuel Shuttle, 1,250,000 Fuel Tankage, 2,500 Holographic Neural-Feed Battle Grid, 1,250 Mk I Gravitic Thruster 1 Mk VI Jump Survey Sensor, 1 Nuclear Transwarp Drive, 100 Siege Tachyon Blaster, 1,695,000 Tckon 68 Particle Beam: 422,400,009 Maneuverability: 32.00, Missile Defense: 50.00 % ** Battle Damage Assessment Report ** -------------------------------------------------- DepLoc 11 ------------------------------------------------------------ WDN Ice Berg s (War Dreadnaught - 24,764,000 tons) [integrity: 19,654,000 / 19,654,000] [shields: 24,621,632,000 / 25,000,000,000] (Green, Timid) 10,000 Cargo Bay, 40 Fuel Shuttle, 5,000,000 Fuel Tankage, 15,000 Holographic Neural-Feed Battle Grid 1 Mk IV Jump Survey Sensor, 100,000 Mk IX Force Shield, 2,000 Mk VI Antimatter Engine, 10,000 Mk VII Standoff Missile 1 Nuclear Transwarp Drive Missile: 2,048,000,000 Maneuverability: 20.68, Missile Defense: 50.00 % ----- Post-Battle Damage Assessment Report----- Side 1 [2] 1 Stormcrow class BB..................................................1 Destroyed Side 2 [11] 1 Ice Berg s class WDN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coconutheads Posted September 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 4, 2009 First let me congratulate you on your 'victories' this turn. You did fail to mention the retaking of a former Black Cloud HW at Skoruba. I think it's more significant than the one you posted about at Evremond since this former HW had what, say 500 pop units (give or take a few). That really hurt and it's loss will greatly hamper our cause you meanie. It will be interesting to see how well the Ice Berg melts when subjected to our firepower. Battle with Obsidian this turn. Same area that Cnuts is surveying. ** NAVAL BATTLE REPORT ** ----- ??????? [ G (Yellow) 8 V ] [single Star] - Warp Point ????? ----- Obsidian, Inc # 1827 (No Naval Commanders) Total tonnage: 5,000,000.....Base Fire Control: 40 [202,500,000 bridge] White Shadow Imperium # 3520 (No Naval Commanders) Total tonnage: 24,764,000.....Base Fire Control: 49 [1,215,000,000 bridge] WSI 7400 White Shadow Imperium #3520 Ranger ------------------------------- ** Imperial Navy Report: Fleet Order of Battle ** ------------------------------------------ Obsidian, Inc # 1827 [Mailed Fist With Single Claw Extended To The Stars] Ominous Sky [ROE: R] *Standard Line* (Fleet Tonnage: 5,000,000) [Deploy Location 2] 1 BB Stormcrow (Battleship - 5,000,000 tons [each]) <650,000 Fuel> ------------------------------- ** Imperial Navy Report: Fleet Order of Battle ** ------------------------------------------ White Shadow Imperium # 3520 [There Be Dragons Here] WSI 7400 [ROE: X] *Column Attack* (Fleet Tonnage: 24,764,000) [Deploy Location 11] 1 WDN Ice Berg s (War Dreadnaught - 24,764,000 tons [each]) <3,514,160 Fuel> ** Battle Damage Assessment Report ** -------------------------------------------------- DepLoc 2 ------------------------------------------------------------ **DESTROYED** [1st] BB Stormcrow (Battleship - 5,000,000 tons) [integrity: 0 / 1,696,960,000] (Green, Timid) 250 Fuel Shuttle, 1,250,000 Fuel Tankage, 2,500 Holographic Neural-Feed Battle Grid, 1,250 Mk I Gravitic Thruster 1 Mk VI Jump Survey Sensor, 1 Nuclear Transwarp Drive, 100 Siege Tachyon Blaster, 1,695,000 Tckon 68 Particle Beam: 422,400,009 Maneuverability: 32.00, Missile Defense: 50.00 % ** Battle Damage Assessment Report ** -------------------------------------------------- DepLoc 11 ------------------------------------------------------------ WDN Ice Berg s (War Dreadnaught - 24,764,000 tons) [integrity: 19,654,000 / 19,654,000] [shields: 24,621,632,000 / 25,000,000,000] (Green, Timid) 10,000 Cargo Bay, 40 Fuel Shuttle, 5,000,000 Fuel Tankage, 15,000 Holographic Neural-Feed Battle Grid 1 Mk IV Jump Survey Sensor, 100,000 Mk IX Force Shield, 2,000 Mk VI Antimatter Engine, 10,000 Mk VII Standoff Missile 1 Nuclear Transwarp Drive Missile: 2,048,000,000 Maneuverability: 20.68, Missile Defense: 50.00 % ----- Post-Battle Damage Assessment Report----- Side 1 [2] 1 Stormcrow class BB..................................................1 Destroyed Side 2 [11] 1 Ice Berg s class WDN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WKE235 Posted September 4, 2009 Report Share Posted September 4, 2009 First let me congratulate you on your 'victories' this turn. You did fail to mention the retaking of a former Black Cloud HW at Skoruba. I think it's more significant than the one you posted about at Evremond since this former HW had what, say 500 pop units (give or take a few). That really hurt and it's loss will greatly hamper our cause you meanie. It will be interesting to see how well the Ice Berg melts when subjected to our firepower. Battle with Obsidian this turn. Same area that Cnuts is surveying.WDN Ice Berg s (War Dreadnaught - 24,764,000 tons) [integrity: 19,654,000 / 19,654,000] [shields: 24,621,632,000 / 25,000,000,000] (Green, Timid) 10,000 Cargo Bay, 40 Fuel Shuttle, 5,000,000 Fuel Tankage, 15,000 Holographic Neural-Feed Battle Grid 1 Mk IV Jump Survey Sensor, 100,000 Mk IX Force Shield, 2,000 Mk VI Antimatter Engine, 10,000 Mk VII Standoff Missile 1 Nuclear Transwarp Drive Missile: 2,048,000,000 Maneuverability: 20.68, Missile Defense: 50.00 % Since you started it, you now have to name your counter-ship something in line with this. Maybe you can build a WDN named the Global Warming? Or maybe a fleet of Methane This ships???? Of course this could get our of hand and he counters with the Al Gore. After which it will be nothing but chaos.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coconutheads Posted September 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 4, 2009 Technically WSI restarted this topic today so... But who needs creativity when War, Death and Famine lie in wait for him? First let me congratulate you on your 'victories' this turn. You did fail to mention the retaking of a former Black Cloud HW at Skoruba. I think it's more significant than the one you posted about at Evremond since this former HW had what, say 500 pop units (give or take a few). That really hurt and it's loss will greatly hamper our cause you meanie. It will be interesting to see how well the Ice Berg melts when subjected to our firepower. Battle with Obsidian this turn. Same area that Cnuts is surveying.WDN Ice Berg s (War Dreadnaught - 24,764,000 tons) [integrity: 19,654,000 / 19,654,000] [shields: 24,621,632,000 / 25,000,000,000] (Green, Timid) 10,000 Cargo Bay, 40 Fuel Shuttle, 5,000,000 Fuel Tankage, 15,000 Holographic Neural-Feed Battle Grid 1 Mk IV Jump Survey Sensor, 100,000 Mk IX Force Shield, 2,000 Mk VI Antimatter Engine, 10,000 Mk VII Standoff Missile 1 Nuclear Transwarp Drive Missile: 2,048,000,000 Maneuverability: 20.68, Missile Defense: 50.00 % Since you started it, you now have to name your counter-ship something in line with this. Maybe you can build a WDN named the Global Warming? Or maybe a fleet of Methane This ships???? Of course this could get our of hand and he counters with the Al Gore. After which it will be nothing but chaos.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Shadow Imperium Posted September 4, 2009 Report Share Posted September 4, 2009 So Cnuts is fully intending on helping Obsidian? I THOUGHT you were fighting Obsidian? In answer to earlier thread, on if Cnuts is offensive, Phonetic guide SEE NUTS. All HW's conquered by the evil empires have not been restored to WSI control, and no matter the number of citizens lost, and we decry the slave labor camps they must of been transferred to, those that were saved, are gloriously happy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.